Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] 28mm M Lens recommendation
From: bob geoghegan <bobgeo@dgiinc.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 12:35:28 -0400
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010606090808.029e07a8@duke.dgiinc.com> <200106061223.f56CNHa08989@hermes.toad.net>
 
Maybe it's the Leica "M," for mature audiences only.....

At 11:13 AM 6/6/2001, you wrote:
> >How 'bout the Konica 28?  Photodo rates it a whisker above the Elmarit-M
> >(and equal to the Zeiss Contax G 28 except for higher distortion).
> >
> >Or is there some reason to worry about Brand "K" mating coupling to a Leica
> >M body?
> >
> >Bob G
>
>
>I would never use a "K" lens on my M. Not only do the letters not match,
>all this "mating" and "coupling" is just a little too sexy for me.
>
>Guy
In reply to: Message from bob geoghegan <bobgeo@dgiinc.com> (Re: [Leica] 28mm M Lens recommendation)
Message from "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net> (Re: [Leica] 28mm M Lens recommendation)