Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon + Tamron revisited
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 16:27:16 -0700
References: <B7408632.2720%cyberdog@attglobal.net> <3.0.5.32.20010604181246.00a94440@pacific.net.sg>

><Snip>  I reckon
> that when I find that my eyes no longer focus properly, I might have to
> rely more and more on my Contax G2. At least, being a cross between a
> rangefinder and an AF SLR, the G2 will not irritate me when the focus is a
> wee bit off.
> 
> Dan K
> *this idyllic island was into its hot season. Hot means sweating on the
> spot. I had to bathe thrice a day to get rid of the sweat. This drains your
> energy and at the end of the day, nothing beats a nice cold beer.
> 


Last year i chewed Dan out for shooting some lost tribe with this G2 and this
year he pays me back by going to another one and bringing some Tamron (gag me
with one it sure sounds like it) on a Nikon.
I can say "Gee what if you used a Leica M or R even" and next year he'll bring a
Canon EOS to some other amazing deal.
Where's the Leica's Dan?
What kind of situation does it need to be to be shot with with a Leica M?
I think it is good for other things then kids birthday parties.
GIVE it is shot!! I say but i said that already.
DAN is determined to not trust his important photographic situations to his Leicas.
As nice and well meaning a guy as i know he is. This is bound to make many of us wince.
TOO MANY CAMERAS! 
Put them all in storage for a year, take the batteries out.
Shoot for a year with only M's!. I did.
THEN tell me how many shots you mist.
I think you will be surprised to find how few.
If any. 

Especially if you put a 280 on a R8 when you need some definite reach.

The always predictable
Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon
USA

http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/

In reply to: Message from D Khong <dkhong@pacific.net.sg> (Re: [Leica] Nikon + Tamron revisited)