Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH
From: D Khong <dkhong@pacific.net.sg>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 17:10:29 +0800
References: <3B12AFB9.DC923B65@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <E65052A28282D4119D9100508BE3286C0175F387@emss07m07.lmtas.lmco.com> <009801c0e6f1$0fa2acc0$56eda918@twmi.rr.com> <f05010419b737b32bc4ad@[195.64.107.10]> <3B12AFB9.DC923B65@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
 
>>By the way i always thought 21 was superwide because it had the same 
>>diagonal as
>>the 38 Biogon form the Hassy "superwide."
>>but i find out this week that the horizontal angle on my 24 matches 
>>that on the
>>38 Biogon.
>>(Actually a 25 mm lens would more exactly (Distagon?))
>>So I'm already shooting superwide and didn't even know it!
>>So a 21 I'd call an Ultrawide!
>>
>>Mark Rabiner
>
>What do you call 15 mm and 12 mm?
>
>Chris
>-- 

TooWide.

Dan K.

- -----------------------------------------------------------------
                   Think before you act,
               think twice before you speak.
=================================================================
In reply to: Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)
Message from "Mose, J P" <j.p.mose@lmco.com> (FW: [Leica] Leica Users digest V20 #29)
Message from "David Kieltyka" <daverk@msn.com> ([Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)
Message from Christer Almqvist <christer@almqvist.net> ([Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)