Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] For All But Brian To Read
From: Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 01:12:10 -0700
References: <200105261904.PAA27009@tigercat.pwj.com>

I like the mlist feature where a contributor's file is stored on the mlist
server and the mlist software provides a link to the
file/document/photo/whatever.  A user extracts the file at their own
choice/leisure/risk/etc.
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <shino@ubspainewebber.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] For All But Brian To Read


> i agree, attachments are a bad idea.
>
> email is ideal for textual infromation, poor for media.
> the main flaw is duplication of content, which when the
> list is large, and the content is fat, makes for
> extremely poor use of bandwidth.
>
> better to send URLs for images; it's up to the discretion of the
> receive to see them.
>
> -rei
>
> > From: Pascal <cyberdog@attglobal.net>
> >
> > On 26-05-2001 06:22 S Dimitrov wrote:
> >
> > > oes that mean we'll be able to start
> > > sending in HTML and attachments?
> >
> > This would be clogging up subscribers' email boxes and hard disks and,
> > moreover, not all email programs are coping well with attachments, html
and
> > the like. Plain text is the rule, and so it should remain. We should all
try
> > to avoid "polluting" our systems more than they already are... :-)
> >
> > Pascal
> > NO ARCHIVE
>

In reply to: Message from shino@ubspainewebber.com (Re: [Leica] For All But Brian To Read)