Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 5/23/01 5:54:21 PM, SonC@sonc.com writes: << Dan, I could not agree with you more. I spent many years in a serious career of photojournalism, working for a major market CBS affiliate. While there were many painful moments that I had to record, I always tried to be respectful of those people whose lives were being touched by tragedies, large and small. When I posted my street shooting spoof last month of the Boy Scouts, ( http://www.sonc.com/street_shooting.htm ) I got several complimentary emails, but to my dismay, others thought the picture a serious attempt at "street photography" and roundly criticised it with, "that's not street shooting!" While I find elegance in much of what is called street photography, there's a good bit of it that I find demeaning and intrusive to the subjects. While some may call it bold, much of it, while not illegal, is just bad manners. Regards, SonC >> With all due respect, I'm still not sure I understand this artificial di stinction between "mere street photography" and photojournalism. Is it the so-called skills level of photojournalists, the fact that some have gone to journalism school or what? To me alot of this boils down to intent, and whilst I respect photojournalists who truly are willing to dedicate their lives to tell the story, one has to recognize that there are equally those photojournalists who hide behind the slogan of "telling the story" as a means of furthering their egos, reputations, careers and the like. I'm not sure why "street photogrphers" should be sneered at, simply because they don't have a major corporation standing behind them. Kim