Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Small dilemma
From: "Jerry S. Justianto" <jsjm6@cbn.net.id>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 16:43:46 +0700
References: <F2076EBSotwBP8xidGV0000fac5@hotmail.com>

Bring the light ones, that's the one you will mostly use.
My suggestions are:
35 f/2
and
90 f/2.8




- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Logan Reinwood" <reinwood007@hotmail.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:01 PM
Subject: [Leica] Small dilemma


Hi,

I have currently a small dilemma:

I will make a few travels in the following weeks and I hesitate on which 
lens to take with me, to fir my M6 and M3.

Should I take my 21/4, 31/1.4 asph, 50 2.8, 90 2.8 or
21/4, 35/2 pre-asph, 50/1, 90 2.8?

I would like not to carry both 35 lux and Noctilux and have a light lens.

My first trip will be to Vienna and the second to Alaska.

OT: Is there any LUG member in Alaska? Is there a photo-shop that
make good E-6 development in ANchorage?

TIA,

logan.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

In reply to: Message from "Logan Reinwood" <reinwood007@hotmail.com> ([Leica] Small dilemma)