Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 02:21 PM 5/18/01 -0700, you wrote: >Given I've said my anti whining piece. ;-) Let me ask. How many LUGnuts >would consider using the R 100mm 2.8 macro or any 100 mm lens, as a "normal >lens?" Or as a better than 50mm for a broad base of shooting opportunities? >Any thoughts folks along the use of this lens? >ted Ted - As much as I love this lens, and it is one of my favorites, I would have to say that the 35/1.4 would come closer to a "normal lens" than either the 50 or the 100. Just the way I see! Leically, Tina Tina Manley, ASMP http://www.tinamanley.com