Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Useful discussion or black tape?
From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 22:29:58 -0400
References: <20010518160307.QVNR21661.femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[65.1.114.25]> <3B058983.8E16F59B@rabiner.cncoffice.com>

At 02:21 PM 5/18/01 -0700, you wrote:

>Given I've said my anti whining piece. ;-) Let me ask.    How many LUGnuts
>would consider using the R 100mm 2.8 macro or any 100 mm lens, as a "normal
>lens?"  Or as a better than 50mm for a broad base of shooting opportunities?
>Any thoughts folks along the use of this lens?
>ted

Ted -

As much as I love this lens, and it is one of my favorites, I would have to 
say that the 35/1.4 would come closer to a "normal lens" than either the 50 
or the 100.  Just the way I see!

Leically,

Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com

Replies: Reply from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Useful discussion or black tape?)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Useful discussion or black tape?)
In reply to: Message from henry <henry@henryambrose.com> (Re: [Leica] Useful discussion or black tape?)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Useful discussion or black tape?)