Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Audi blows Leica's trumpet!
From: Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 12:21:46 -0700
References: <B724605A.16BDF%mlquinn@san.rr.com>

Did you mean maintenance costs less?
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Quinn" <mlquinn@san.rr.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Audi blows Leica's trumpet!


> Tom Schofield wrote:
>
> > I hate seeing a IIIG compared to an Audi.  Having owned two Audi's, I
can
> > say they have 10 years tops before there's nothing left to do with them
but
> > donate them for the tax deduction.
>
> Hmmm. Well, value depends on whether you're buying, selling, or using
them.
> My Audi's resale "value" has been about the same as an M3 for the last 8
of
> its 18 years.  Both M3 and Audi still work nicely, and maintenance for
> either costs more than buying something else new. I've put more miles on
the
> Audi...
>
>

In reply to: Message from Mike Quinn <mlquinn@san.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] Audi blows Leica's trumpet!)