Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Canonet Rangefinder=Poor Man's Leica?
From: stiles <stiles@s-way.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 19:05:02 -0400
References: <20010515194706.24951.qmail@web4101.mail.yahoo.com>

ara ayer wrote:
> 
> Wondering if any of you have had the opportunity
> to shoot/own a Canonet GIII QL17?

Dear Ara,
	Yes, the Canonet is the poor man's Leica, limited to the 40/1.7 on the
camera. The shutter might even be quieter.  I have two. Most of them
need the viewfinder haze cleaned out and the foam seals in the back
replaced. So you might find that your $65 camera needs $125 worth of
work to bring it up to spec.  Unless you need the faster lens and manual
focus, a Yashica T4 might be a better choice. (Smaller, too.)
	I have found batteries at
http://www.photobattery.com/
and Stephen Gandy has a nice review at
http://www.cameraquest.com/canql17.htm
	I have found the Canonet will give me a very nice 11X14 in terms of
sharpness, but I wish the iris diaphram had more than five leaves.
Regards,
Phil Stiles NH USA


>

In reply to: Message from ara ayer <araayer@yahoo.com> ([Leica] Canonet Rangefinder=Poor Man's Leica?)