Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You are trying to read and reason at the same time. The differential is too great on the LUG ____________________________ The Rev'd Charles E Cason Jr St. Peter's Episcopal Church (Ripon WI) 1805 Arlington Drive Oshkosh, WI 54904 (920) 231-8851 Mailto:cec@vbe.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Victor Wek Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:53 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] Re: Konica fiction - a term definition I probably do not understand current “Konica fiction” discussion, because of mix terms used. What is “image quality”? If we all agree that photography is a form of art , image quality is immeasurable. We can discuss film quality, lens quality, paper quality, when we agree what we will measure to define that. But image quality, how technically we can measure image (painting?) quality of Van Gogh or Rafael art? For certain effect older Leica lenses can be better then newer (i.e. bokeh). And I can understand DR Summicron has better “image quality” then the newest one, if I look for particular visual effect the newer lenses lack. I am confused, Victor Earth, Solar System ____________________________________________________________ _____________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.