Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: Konica fiction
From: "Dante A. Stella" <dante@umich.edu>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 12:49:19 -0500
References: <B72310BF.DF4A%apbbeijing@yahoo.com> <DAV47KWL3DgCksgY2mt00001174@hotmail.com>
 
The Konica year is longer by 0.2 days!

"SonC (Sonny Carter) ( : > D" wrote:

> ((SNIP-SNIP-SNIP)))>>>>>>KonicaWhendidLeitzenteris
> youngeroptical firmbeforeapproximatelywereferring
> to heritagebeforeheritagehalfcenturybuiltbyOskar
>
> So, which year is longer . . .  a Leica year or a
> Konica  year?
>
> SonC
In reply to: Message from apbbeijing <apbbeijing@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] RE: Konica fiction)
Message from "SonC (Sonny Carter) ( : > D" <SonC@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] RE: Konica fiction)