Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lucien, thanks for the information. Being of faint heart, perhaps I will either a) get the SA and use a hand-held meter or b) save up for a more modern lens! Regards Mark - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lucien" <director@ubi.edu> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: 07 May 2001 10:26 Subject: Re: [Leica] 21mm SA - metering with M6TTL > Mark Pope wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I had a look at a 21mm Super Angulon on a M2 last week. I noticed a couple > > of threads recently about this lens. Many of the comments were borne out by > > some slides that I saw that had been taken with this lens. They were > > stunning. > > > > As a A 21mm is a lens that I would like to have (one day), I have three of > > questions: > > firstly, if a 21 SA is fitted to an M6TTL, will the meter work? > > Mark, > > In November 1988, Jeremy Kime asked somebody to modify > his Super-Angulon 21/3,4 in the way described on the > following website: > > <http://reality.sgi.com/jessen_esd/angulon_mod.html> (closed today) > > > Modifying the Leica Super-Angulon f3.4 : > > > TTL metering is possible. > > Not for the Faint-Hearted. > > > The f3.4 Super Angulon can be made to work with the light meter on the M6 body. > > This process involves "machining" the rear collar of the lens > > (though it can be done with simple tools, outside of a machine shop). > > > 1.It is assumed that you are ready to dismantle and modify your lens. > > 2.The meter will read 1/3 stop under, which is compensated for by advancing > > the film speed dial by one notch. > > 3.The lens should be focused to close range in order to accurately meter. > > Close-focusing is needed to nudge the rear glass out of the way of the > > metering eye, and can be quickly done and then un-done while shooting. > > (However, on an M6 with the spot size reduced for tighter metering pattern, > > this close-focusing has been found to be unnecessary.) > > After modification, Jeremy Kime wrote: > > > Got the lens back today, it meters. > > I think the suggestion that it would only be a 1/3 of a stop is generous, so > > far it seems to be about a stop, haven't put any film through it yet but if > > I can end up relying on it being a stop then thats a nice round number to > > deal with and still cheaper than getting that new Elmarit-M ASPH. > > I'll try and test some different apertures on the metering tomorrow.