Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Portra 400 BW (Was: Film Demise)
From: "Margaret Jeffcoat" <margaret01@excelonline.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:02:24 -0400
References: <20010422030311.PYQF28160.femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[65.1.114.25]>

Toes not hurt just making a point that there have been some really wonderful
advancements
on the color end of things. I too feel there is nothing like a good b/w
print done with original b/w
film. I think that is where we all started and nothing short of a true
revolution in B/W will
make our hearts beat differently.
Cheers Wilber
- ----- Original Message -----
From: henry <henry@henryambrose.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Portra 400 BW (Was: Film Demise)


> Sorry,
> Didn't mean to step on your toes.
> And of course you're right about the profit motive.
>
> Henry
>
>
> >Sure, I'll be happy to give you my thoughts. We print all of our color
work
> >on Fuji Crystal Archive paper,
> >accelerated fade test have the paper out past 100 yrs in the very best of
> >conditions. So I would be will
> >to bet that the work we are producing will last past 25 yrs. Really I
don't
> >think there is a film or camera
> >company out there that is not interested in the bottom line. If not we
would
> >have nothing to shoot.
> >Cheers Wilber
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: henry <henry@henryambrose.com>
> >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> >Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 10:28 AM
> >Subject: Re: [Leica] Portra 400 BW (Was: Film Demise)
> >
> >
> >> I think you are right. The whole reason for the existence is this film
is
> >> so that wedding guys can offer a "black& white" service and still have
> >> all their film and prints run on a machine. The images will look like
B&W
> >> to the bride and her mother. And look like faded crap in 25 years. At
> >> this level it makes perfect sense. But why would I want to pay double
> >> price for a roll of film if I don't work this way? I already have XP2
and
> >> its cheap and excellent quality.
> >>
> >> Its more about Kodak getting your money than it is about anything else.
> >> Short circuiting craft and art.
> >>
> >> That said I'd like to hear your impressions of the film when you get a
> >> chance.
> >>
> >> Henry
> >>
> >>
> >> >Calumet has it for $7.00 @ roll in the 36/36exp-5 roll pack. Wonder
what
> >B&H
> >> >wants for it.
> >> >One good point on the stuff from the Pro Portrait Photographers stand
> >point
> >> >is that it is become
> >> >damn hard to find anyone to do finishing in black and white-almost a
dead
> >> >art for retouchers
> >> >and print finishers. I think this will be welcome by a lot of people
if
> >the
> >> >stuff is any good. If it
> >> >works like the other portra films it could be very good. Will test and
> >post
> >> >some of the results.
> >> >Would be great for wedding PJ work and they say that it has a latitude
> >from
> >> >asa 50 to 1600.
> >> >We shall see.
> >> >Cheers Wilber Jeffcoat
> >> >www.jeffcoatphotography.com
> >
> >

In reply to: Message from henry <henry@henryambrose.com> (Re: [Leica] Portra 400 BW (Was: Film Demise))