Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Rigby pinhole cameras
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:46:39 -0700
References: <1120AB2026ABD211A82600A024B97137C08F@einstein.morton.org.uk> <4.1.20010418133759.01fb54f0@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>
 
Jim Brick wrote:
> 
> At 01:12 PM 4/18/01 -0400, Martin Howard wrote:
> >leica@davidmorton.org jotted down the following:
> >
> >> It doesn't matter *how*many times I tell myself that 5x4 is more sensible
> >> because I have a Polaroid back and could use Type 55, that 10x8 is calling
> >> me...
> >
> >11x14" pinhole.  Or 12x20".  Now *that* would be cool.
> >
> >M.
> 
> Polaroid makes 20x24 instant material...  Why think small!
> 
> Jim

And their 8x10 material is quite popular and accessible.


Mark Rabiner
In reply to: Message from leica@davidmorton.org ([Leica] Rigby pinhole cameras)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Rigby pinhole cameras)