Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M3 seal
From: "SML" <inyoung@jps.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:29:32 -0700
References: <003d01c0c14b$fcd1f4e0$e20f113f@computer> <3AD27D3F.147EFCE6@earthlink.net>

Hello,

  As far as I remember, DAG uses "92".

Regards,
David
 
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: Shel Belinkoff <belinkoff@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M3 seal


> Hi ...
> 
> I don't know what the "92" may indicate, but just yesterday I
> noticed the seal on my M#, which was recently CLA'd by Sherry
> Krauter, and it has the letter K embossed in the wax.  Perhaps other
> Leica repair people have their own codes which are put into the wax,
> or the 92 means the year it was last repaired.
> -- 
> Shel Belinkoff
> mailto:belinkoff@earthlink.net
> 
> 
> onetreehillclw wrote:
> > 
> > I have a M3 that instead of the "L" seal, the camera has the
> > number 92 in the seal hole. I know the camera has been taken
> > apart for cleaning, I just have never seen numbers in the place
> > of the "L" seal. It is a double stroke from 1957.
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> > Chris Williams
> 

In reply to: Message from "onetreehillclw" <onetreehillclw@compaq.net> ([Leica] M3 seal)
Message from Shel Belinkoff <belinkoff@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] M3 seal)