Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You mean 28-70 2.8 zoom, don't you? - ----- Original Message ----- From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 6:50 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Trashing > Forgive me, but you guys are really amazing - How the chat works, what > the software is, how fast it runs, etc., is all utterly irrelivant. The > real question is: what will Leica do with and for the R line. And there > was nothing on the "chat" to really tell you anything about that you did > or didn't know before hand. Another Leica marketing tour-de-force. > > P. S. Nikon and Canon don't need to waste their time with chats: > They are constantly updating their products and introducing truly > innovative new one's - they don't have to listen to > owners begging for something a rediculously basic as a 35-70 2.8 zoom. ;-) > > B. D. > Pascal wrote:. > > > On 01-04-2001 05:21, David E. Strang wrote: > > > >> Regarding the Leica chat, when was the last time Nikon or Canon offered to > >> involve users in future projects? Maybe in the future things will be > >> smoother and those looking for a platform to trash Leica will step down. The > >> future is far too bright to let it pass without some positive input from > >> Leica's most vocal users. > > > > > > I agree with you David. > > > > I hope Leica will learn from what happened on Friday and make future > > chatting sessions less lacklustre (technically speaking) and more > > informative. > > > > It could have a winner if it works this through. > > > > Pascal > > NO ARCHIVE > > > > --------- > > Visit my photo pages at http://members.nbci.com/cyberplace > > --------- > > <<< PGP public key available upon request >>> > > > > > > > >