Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I do not need to scan to scan MF at 4000 dpi; if my LS-2000 could scan MF I would be happy with it. But right now I only have an Epson flatbed with transparency adapter to scan MF, and it is not good enough in the long term. So I am eagerly waiting for the arrival of the new Nikon 8000. Nathan Austin Franklin wrote: > > For me it is time to upgrade to the 8000 so I can scan my MF negatives at > > 4000 dpi. > > Our of curiosity, why do you need to scan MF at 4000, or do you just need to > scan MF? - -- Nathan Wajsman Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/ Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/ Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/