Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I did not mean the LUG to go to the dogs...so I looked at the two negatives again. On one of them one paw is completely visitble but the toes on the other one are still cut off. The other problem is that when scanning on my Nikon LS-2000 I have to use the film adapter in the transparency unit, as my negative unit keeps jamming with most of the films I use. So despite my best intentions, the picture will have to stay the way it is, unless I run into the guy and his dog next time I am in London. Nathan Jem Kime wrote: > The 'Collie' (er...) wrote, > "Too bad about the dog's feet getting cut off" > > Methinks that considering it was a PAW photo, (no it's quite good really) that it was too bad the paws were omitted, > Jem ;-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Collier [SMTP:jbcollier@home.com] > Sent: 28 March 2001 18:09 > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 12 is up > > Too bad about the dog's feet getting cut off. > > JBC > > > From: "Rob Conley" <rconley@mprc.umaryland.edu> > > > > Nice shot, and i think that's usually the 'right way for us to get that types > > of shot. > > > > > See at: > > > > http://www.geocities.com/belgiangator/pawindex.htm > > > > and comments are welcome and appreciated as always. > > > > Nathan > > - -- Nathan Wajsman Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/ Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/ Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/