Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/03/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use"
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:40:29 -0500
References: <006001c0b6b4$9bbb8460$b1111840@dimarcojr.pressroom.com> <003d01c0b6cb$a8748a00$511a4d18@gv.shawcable.net> <3AC0EB6A.D570C17A@webshuttle.ch>
Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> You may just have answered a question I was asking myself. Next month I am
> participating in a group exhibition by Viewfinders, the English-language
> photography club in Brussels. My prints are made on my Epson inkjet, and I was
> wondering whether I should call them "giclée" or "inkjet" prints....
>
> Nathan
>
Call them giclee prints is no more pretenious than calling them silver
prints....
How about calling them them photographs..;-)
B. D.
Replies:
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use")
In reply to:
Message from "Sal DiMarco,Jr." <sdmp007@pressroom.com> ([Leica] Re: SNAPS & England & the LHS)
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> ([Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use")
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use")