Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> John... > > There are some very good reasons, in addition to savings, for buying > the pre-aspheric 35 Summicron. I own and use both the aspherical (second > version) and spherical (vintage '86) lenses. I use the spherical expression > more often. This is because I value small, light equipment and an M6 with > the spherical will easily slip into a jacket pocket. I do not want to > ignite a bokeh war, but I like the over-all look of the spherical better for > many pictures...perhaps this is because the spherical has a dozen diaphragm > blades and the aspherical two fewer, but the images are different to my eye. > Who knows? Even at f2.0, the spherical is very sharp...sharper at least > than my shaky hands deserve. Don't get me wrong, the aspherical is a fine > lens...certainly snappier than the spherical at f2.0. Flare? Flare is so > rarely an issue that I don't worry about it unless I WANT to use flare as an > element of the photograph. > > Nota bene, I am not a collector, just the father of two who will let > my kids fight this battle for many years after I am gone. My son and > daughter will be posting their opinions on the two lenses in about twenty > years. > > Buzz Hausner I am right there with you Buss. My poison of choice in a 35 is the pre-asph Summilux 1.4. It is a tiny little thing which I like and to my eye it seems to do very well wide open plus it has a smoother look at all apertures compared to the asph version. Steve Annapolis > > -----Original Message----- > From: John M. Holcomb [mailto:jholcomb@one.net] > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:22 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 35mm M Summicron ASPH lens-flare > > > Does this mean that I should save my $$ and buy the pre-asph 35 2.0 instead? >