Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: 35 1.4 vs. 35 1.4 asph
From: Mark Rabiner <>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:59:30 -0800
References: <> <> wrote:
> 2 years ago I however couldn't resist to purchase one of the 1st version
> lenses, in beautiful chrome and with goggles for the M3. I paid much
> less for this than for my "modern" pre-asph, but I pamper it more. It is
> totally irrational. So am I now facing deportation to the Leica
> collctor's list?
> And of course a chrome lens on a chrome M3 with goggles is more of an
> eyecatcher. People ask qustions.
> Hans-Peter

Yea but your chrome is REAL chrome. The stuff made now is chrome paint!
	irrational but completely logical. It's often best to go by feel i think.

Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon

Replies: Reply from Jeff Moore <> ([Leica] Of Chromes and Viewfinders.)
In reply to: Message from (Re: [Leica] RE: 35 1.4 vs. 35 1.4 asph)