Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]And for you madam, it's JUDGEMENTAL. Seriously, it is inappropriate for you to judge all characters without actually knowing them. A lot of issues you put forward were also far from accurate. Regards, Joseph Yao on 9/3/01 1:59 PM, Amanda Baker at amandabaker80@yahoo.ca wrote: > The recent 35-70/2.8 zoom scandal in fact boils down > to three words: GOODWILL, GREED and GRANDIOSITY. > But it is so intriguing that so many of you got mixed > up in the thread. > > J Collier: GOODWILL misinterpreted as stumbling > block, but in fact only a stumbling block to the > realisation of someone else's greed. How nice a guy > to have in the LUG who did this not for his own > materialistic gain! > > E Lowi: Simple GREED. Who wanted to strike the iron > when it?s still hot, and got himself burned. > > J Yao: (1) GRANDIOSITY. No doubt he is a very rich > man: just think even if Leica sold him the zoom at the > original price of USD1.5k, cash upfront for 1000 > lenses would be USD1.5M. But WHAT IF Leica really > agreed to his terms? Yao is a gray-market seller. > Would it be fair to all the authorized Leica agents in > the whole world? No man with a sound mind will > believe that he would keep all 1000 lenses. Did he > ever say he would sell it to fellow LUGgers with a > non-profit-making margin? Yes, he needn?t do that. > But then, you understand...... > > There is no problem with profit-making. It?s only his > grandiose overtones that made one feel uncomfortable: > remember he said in the past nearly any product will > come by should he increase the offer? This time his > monetary might could not get Leica to yield, and thus > his frustration and constant whining and denigratoty > remarks to Solms thereafter. > > (2) GREED. At the time when he had not got this zoom, > I sympathized with his Leicaholic crave, because as he > said he "still missed one tool in his toolbox." But > when he?s got more than a dozen of it, and still wants > more, you understand.......... just simple user or > gray market seller? > > Simon?s Cameras: GREED if they sold the lense to > someone who offered more. But what if they sold to > the final buyer at the same price? Just procedural > mistake? > > Amanda Baker > > > _______________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca