Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] zoom scandal
From: "Jay Coleman" <jaycoleman@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:55:23 -0800

And what does a broker do?

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Simon Lamb
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 8:28 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] zoom scandal


As an end to my contribution to nitpicking, it is illegal to offer for sale
anything to which you do not own legal title.  eBay clearly states this
also.


- ----- Original Message -----
From: <ARTHURWG@aol.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] zoom scandal


> If Mano had a verbal agreement to buy the lens, he can also offer it for
sale
> in good faith. This kind of nit picking is silly. He could sue the
provider,
> ebay customers could sue mano, everyone could sue Dr. Yao. But try and
> collect? Arthur
>

Replies: Reply from "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com> (Re: [Leica] zoom scandal)