Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: R: [Leica] Re:Angenieux/Leica-R zoom questions
From: "lindabo" <lindaboz@tin.it>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 23:56:22 +0100
References: <200103061511.HAA14967@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <006401c0a68c$cd34dd80$dd66989e@demon.co.uk>

Hello,
I used some years ago both the Angenieux 35/70 and 45-90.
I found the 35-70 a very good performer but  I was disappointed by the
warm(Yellowish) color rendition. I sold it. I still have the 45-90 which
seldom satisfies very much my eyes.
Giancarlo
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Doug Richardson <doug@meditor.demon.co.uk>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:28 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re:Angenieux/Leica-R zoom questions


>
> >Jem Kime wondered whether any LUGgers posess or have used the 35-70
> f2.5-3.3 Angenieux lens - any reports on the quality?
>
> Can't speak for the optical quality, but I handled one a month or so
> ago in a London store, and noted very quickly that on this example the
> sleeve which controls the focal length had cracked. This seemed to be
> a very thin and flimsy piece of plastic - hardly surprising it had
> broken.
>
> I recall someone on the LUG asking why I was so opposed to the use of
> plastic in Leica equipment. Well, this lens demonstrated my
> objection - sooner or later (and probably sooner) a plastic component
> will break.
>
> Regards,
>
> Doug Richardson
>
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Doug Richardson" <doug@meditor.demon.co.uk> ([Leica] Re:Angenieux/Leica-R zoom questions)