Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: auto responder
From: David Mason <dcm@redhat.com>
Date: 06 Mar 2001 06:23:10 -0500
References: <000f01c0a5b8$6c44fd40$2788d8d4@default> <002301c0a5be$8f573400$e36b193f@oemcomputer> <4.1.20010306070928.0441c340@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>

Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> writes:


> The problem is that many folks are either behind a firewall or a router
> that acts like a firewall and getting through to the machine is extremely
> difficult, if possible at all. Here at Agilent, I'm behind a very strong
> firewall and at home I'm behind a cable router which does URL translation,
> among other things, which will keep all but the smartest and most dedicated
> hacker out. Basically, it is too much work to hack through my router to get
> to the machines behind it. Especially since there is a high probability of
> failure.


The best response to either spammers or auto-responders gone bad is to
look up the domain name in question at Network Solutions and give the
owner of the offender an email or a call. Most good sys-admins have
the same gripes about list problems we have expressed and will take
swift action.


Cheers,

Dave

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: auto responder)
Reply from "Stanislaw B.A. Stawowy" <watteau@krakow.neurosoft.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: auto responder)
In reply to: Message from "Robert Appleby" <rob@robertappleby.com> ([Leica] auto responder)
Message from "Wilber Jeffcoat" <wilber@jeffcoatphotography.com> (Re: [Leica] auto responder)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: auto responder)