Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: FW: [Leica] 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M ASPH vs. 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M pre-asph
From: "goldframe" <goldframe1@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 15:47:01 -0700

- -----Original Message-----
From: goldframe [mailto:goldframe1@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 12:49 PM
To: Sander van Hulsenbeek
Subject: RE: [Leica] 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M ASPH vs. 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M
pre-asph

 I think I see what you mean - sort of.  The 2 photos are so dissimilar in
the foreground as well as different (exposure - position) background.  It's
a little hard for me to make a direct comparison.  Wish they were done
immediately one after the other.

Thank you,

gold

- -----Original Message-----
From: Sander van Hulsenbeek [mailto:vanhulsenbeek@wxs.nl]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 2:38 AM
To: Leica-Users; goldframe1@yahoo.com; henry@henryambrose.com
Subject: Re: [Leica] 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M ASPH vs. 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M
pre-asph

Look at the following webpage with a bokeh comparison of the two lenses
I love my ASPH!
Sander van Hulsenbeek
Amsterdam Holland

http://home.wxs.nl/~sanderva/SummiTest.htm

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: FW: [Leica] 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M ASPH vs. 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M pre-asph)