Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: UV Filters
From: Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 07:22:39 -0800
References: <DBECILMEBBNHGNMILHMNEEAHCPAA.ahongun@ecsysinc.com> <3.0.6.32.20010301083322.00989680@POP6.sympatico.ca>

Hay Dan... I thought you had a filter in your e-mail reader that trashed
any subject that contained the word "filter."  What happened??? 

Jim


At 09:19 AM 3/1/01 -0500, Dan Cardish wrote:
>Yeah....I guess so....another post made too early in the morning.  
>
>What I mean is (and I hope I don't dig myself any deeper), I resent people
>on the LUG telling me that I am defective because I happen to like my
>camera equipment looking new (I think brassy cameras look like crap).  New
>looks nice, old don't, IMHO.   I have nothing against collectors, and
>nothing against hardworking professionals.  If people like the look of Jim
>Marshal's M4, thats just fine with me.  But if you are truly a hard working
>professional, you shouldn't be worrying about how much brass is showing.  
>
>Medals are for parades, not the battleground.
>
>Dan C.

In reply to: Message from "A. H. Ongun" <ahongun@ecsysinc.com> (RE: [Leica] UV Filters)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] UV Filters)