Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Horace, All the Noctilux, up to the ones I received two weeks ago, are still Canadian, although they all had the Leica Solms issued 'Test Certificate'. I have never seen a German Noctilux. Has any LUGgers? Cheers, Joseph on 26/2/01 8:57 PM, Dr H L Lau at shllau@hkusua.hku.hk wrote: > After the ELCAN plant was sold to Raytheon in 1998, it was believed that the > production of > the 75mm Summilux and the Noctilux would be moved to Solms; Stephan Gandy on > his > website also stated this "expectation". So far the "new" German-made 75mm > Summilux has > appeared (order no. changed from 11815 to 11810, same optical design, but a > slightly > different mechanical design in the helicoid resulting in some 40g reduction in > weight). > But the German-made Noctilux has yet to come, at least as far as a > newly-shipped-in-from-Solms Noctilux (which my friend bought from the > respectable Dr > Joseph Yao a couple of weeks ago) went -- it was "made in Canada". My > Noctilux bought > last year (serial no. 3814xxx, which includes the signed Test Certificate > introduced in late > 2000) was also made in Canada. > One speculation was that Leica is just selling the unsold stock from ELCAN. > This is an > interesting topic to follow, especially now when all Leica M lenses are > supposedly made in > Germany. The recent thread on LUG concerning the 35-75 mm f/2.8 > Vario-Elmarit-R ASPH > also shed light on the technical "problems" Leica has faced with. The dealers > that I know in > Hong Kong, Japan and Germany also maintain that the Noctilux is being made in > Germany. > This added to the "mystery" of where the Noctilux is currently produced (those > who couldn't > care less of the country of manufacture can save their time and stop reading > on). > When I enquired ELCAN of any currently produced lenses for still-picture > photography, their > answer is that the Noctilux is still being made there! I enclose their e-mail > reply in the > following. The big question now is not WHERE anymore, but WHY? > > Horace Lau