Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]goldframe wrote: > > Lets see if this works?? > > This thread is subject to “Sundown Ordinance” – only to be continued till > Sundown! > > Does anyone have a visual example of a shot done with a bokeh loaded Leica > lens and an identical shot with the another camera using same camera and > lens settings from a lens without apparent bokeh?? > > A side-by-side example for illustration. > > Thanks - gold > > NO RIDICULE NO RIDICULE?!??!?!!! NO RIDICULE??!?!?!?! Don't give me no steeeeenkin' NO RIDICULE!?!?@!?!... As BOW KA is simply the Japanese term for the appearance of the out-of-focus portion of an image, there is no lens without BOW KA! Some lenses have what, to some observers, is more pleasing BOW KA than other lenses. Some for instance, and I believe the NYE KON 50 1.4 is a prime example of this, have what might be termed DDB - Dead Drunk BOW KAH - in which one sees double images in the out of focus areas. Some lenses, on the other hand, produce delightful smears in the out of focus areas. While others still produce - ohmigod! - out of focus images in the out of focus area. However, when all is said and done, what counts is what is in the IN FOCUS area...;-) B. D. (heading back to his room)