Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Whichever one you go for allow for a cla. Things that show up on cameras that age are culred shutter blinds, winder bearing problems leading to uneven film spacing, and shutter speed problems. I used my 28 on both my M4-2 and M6 and I used the external finder on it and it was great. The frames in the M6 are useless IMO - the 0.56 however is grrreat! Julian - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Juan J. Buhler" <jbuhler@pdi.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 7:43 PM Subject: [Leica] M4-2 vs M4-P > > So, I'm still looking for a user Leica RF. I have read the resources > in the web, but it would be nice to hear first hand opinions. > > I gather the main difference between the M4-2 and M4-P is that the > M4-2 doesn't have 28mm framelines? Can anyone comment on using 28mm > lenses on an M4-2? Are the viewfinder the same otherwise? (ie > magnification) > > In short, is it worth paying ~200 more for an M4-P instead of a M4-2, > if the cameras are in similar condition? > > With thanks, > > j > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Juan J. Buhler | FX Animator @ PDI | http://www.crosswinds.net/~jbuhler > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >