Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] ............
From: "Jason Hall" <JASON@jbhall.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:07:35 -0000
References: <DMENLEOIAIMCJBFLHKLBGEENCCAA.tim@KairosPhoto.com>

And theres no H in Worcester

Jason Hall
Nr Worcester

> > > > If WORCHESTER is Wuhster, then why isn't DORCHESTER
Duhster...Or, if
> > > > DORCHESTER is DOOR CHESTER, then why isn WORCHESTER, WAR
CHESTER?;-)
> > >
> > > You ill literate!
>
>
> Because BICESTER is BISTER and CHICHESTER is CHII CHESTER  Oh, and
WOBURN is
> WOABURN (as in Woburn Abbey)!!  (Oh, and my wifes middle name is
Ruthven =
> Riven, so I guess the Scots are in on it too :)
>
> Tim A
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of B. D.
Colen
> > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 8:45 AM
> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] ............
> >
> >
> > Austin Franklin wrote:
> > >
> > > > If WORCHESTER is Wuhster, then why isn't DORCHESTER
Duhster...Or, if
> > > > DORCHESTER is DOOR CHESTER, then why isn WORCHESTER, WAR
CHESTER?;-)
> > >
> > > You ill literate!
> >
> > Hey! Ansah the question!
> >
> > TLFKAG
> >
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com> (RE: [Leica] ............)