Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]After following the DOF thread - or, more accurately, attempting to follow its occasional branchings - for some time, I remembered that I had inquired about the circles of confusion (CoC) used in marking Leica's and Hasselblad's lenses, respectively. FWIW here are the answers, retyped from the printouts (I no longer have the messages, and I have changed my e-mail address). (From Leica): "Subject: Re: Circle of Cunfusion Date: 19 Jan 2000 From: Olesin@aol.com TO: obryk@flash.netdex.com The size of the CoC upon which we mark depth of field scales is 1/30th mm. I'm afraid the actual mathematical formulae are left to textbooks on optics, as we are unfortunately not equipped to delve into the theoretical background. This should answer at least half of your question. Thank you for your e-mail." (From Hasselblad): "Subject: Ang: Depth of field scales Date: 19 Jan 2000 From: erland.petterson@hasselblad.se TO: obryk@flash.netdex.com CC: torbjorn.eriksson@hasselblad.se Dear Mr. Bryk, The circle of confudion (sic) has a diameter of 60 microns. The indications on the lens barrels are theoretical distances for different apertures for a lens without other lens errors. This means that diffraction effects is (sic) also not included. Our recommendation is to take the indicated depth-of-field with some care. If you need good quality we recommend to only use half the indicated DOF. For example if you use aperture f/11 you should consider DOF for aperture f/5.6 as good quality. Sincerely yours, VICTOR HASSELBLAD AB Erland Petterson Product Manager Camera Systems (phone, fax nos)"