Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Why the DOF markings don't work all the time
From: Henry Ambrose <digphoto@telalink.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:41:59 -0600

http://www.ida.liu.se/~marho/dof/dof.html 

**********quote from above article***********
The presence of aberrations, especially spherical, does increase depth of 
focus, and hence depth of field as well. The reason is that the rays from 
the rim of the aperture of a spherically aberrant lens come to a focus at 
a different distance from the lens than rays from the center, so that 
there will be an image of sorts all the way from the marginal focus to 
the axial focus, although at no point
will the image be clean and sharp. Incidentally, this explains why simple 
lenses can be used on box cameras with no focusing mechanisms; a well 
corrected could not be used this way because it would have too little 
depth of focus.
******end quote****************

I think this is the best explanation for why the newest lenses and films 
seem to not work well using old values for DOF. Its why when you follow 
the marks on the lens for DOF at a given aperture and distance they might 
not suffice. 
The easy answer is use one stop more than indicated.

I'm happy to have lenses that good.

Henry

Replies: Reply from "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Why the DOF markings don't work all the time)