Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, I did read your post, and I understand it, and believe it is irrelevant. Did you read my post? > Okay Austin, > > I am speechless... > > So you think.... > > You did actually read my post? > e p > ......oh well. > > Cheers, > > John > > > From: "austin@darkroom.com" <austin@darkroom.com> > > > > I disagree. If you take the same lense, and use it on ANY > size film, at the > > same distance, you will get the same DOF. Optics doesn't > know what the film > > size is, and adjust it self accordingly. 3' IS 3', no > matter what the film > > size is. > > > > I don't disagree that if you change the distance, to > re-frame the image so it > > is the same composition you will get different DOF, but > that is not part of > > the discussion...the DOF calculator keeps the same > distance, just changes in > > the film format change the resultant DOF it gives you. I > believe that is > > wrong. > > > >> Depth of field is a factor of image size and relative > aperture. The film > >> format/ lens combination affects the image size. A 45mm > lens in on a 4x5 > >> camera will record an object "smaller" in the final print > than a 45mm on a > >> 35mm camera. You could enlarge the 4x5 negative more than > normally is done > >> and print an identical image size (assuming you shot both > cameras at the > >> same subject distance) and achieve identical depth of > field (and COC) but > >> this is not normal practice. > > > >>>> http://www.silverlight.co.uk/resources/dof_calc.html > >>>> > >>> > >>> This web page changes the DOF based on film format...why > would film format > >>> effect DOF? > > >