Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]And too bad my Hexar's not up to snuff vis-a-vis my M3, which is now going for its second post-CLA shutter fix. And if Marc Small is right, it will be going back every year. Dan Honemann wrote: > Yeah, too bad the Hexar isn't made up to the quality standards of my Leica > M6 TTL, less than one year old, that a) needs a vertical RF adjustment, b) > can't accurately close focus my new 75/1.4 summilux-M (consistently off by > 2" in my tests), and c) has screwed up electronics that drive my SF 20 crazy > (it works fine on the Hexar though). Or my Leica Universal Polarizer that's > six months old and falling apart. Both will be spending time in NJ soon. > > Dan > > > Akhil, > > Sorry, I can't be of any help here.... My opinion of the > > Konica Hexar is > > that it was a poorly made piece when compared to a real M camera and did > > offer enough features over an M camera for me to consider it. > > Maybe someone else can help you. > > Good Luck, > > Sal