Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: RE: [Leica] 24mm Leica-M
From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:38:05 -0500
 
> Comparable to the superwide would be the 21 though.

Oh, Mark...you know better.  Nothing is comparable to the SuperWide ;-)  The
Biogon 38 is, as far as 'normally available' lenses go, the lowest
distortion, widest angle there is.  The 21 surely has more distortion than
the Biogon 38.  Not that there is anything wrong with the 21, and I do have
a 24, and think the world of it...but they are different than the Biogon
(which I also have).
Replies: Reply from "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> (RE: [Leica] 24mm Leica-M)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] 24mm Leica-M)
Reply from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] 24mm Leica-M)