Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Henry, I bought the 24mm for my M6HM after considerable research because I wanted a lens that gave results comparable to my Hasselblad Superwide (38mm or 1/2 normal focal length) for landscape photography. I am not interested in greater area coverage but in greater depth of field. I like to create images with what I call "foreground immediacy"; I remember that Ansel Adams called it "near-far composition". Oliver Bryk Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:00:21 -0800 (PST) From: Henry Krzciuk <hkrzciuk@yahoo.com> Subject: [Leica] Tips on using 24mm M lens Message-ID: <20010129170021.16901.qmail@web217.mail.yahoo.com> References: During a weak moment, I purchased a 24MM for my M6TTL. I now have the 24mm, 35 f2 asph, 50 f2, and 90mm f2 asph. I am interested in the types of situations that people use the 24mm vs say the 35mm. And I would like to understand what they expect to be different besides just the greater area covered. I have noticed that the frame in my viewfinder does not appear to be level. I am going to be doing more checking on this. I have tried shooting some people and it seems to do this without unacceptable levels of facial distortion. The lens does appear to be very sharp. Again, I am interested in hearing what most people have found to be the sweet situations for using this lens. Thanks.