Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/01/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar NOT Back on Top
From: "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 19:54:34 -0500
References: <3A6FB641.7E061E68@CameraQuest.com> <v04011708b6963cb2098f@[208.187.35.179]> <3A70BB1D.35DF2AA0@umich.edu> <3A719749.4C9DE21B@earthlink.net> <3A71A25F.BDC9C888@CameraQuest.com>
Now THAT looks like a proper Leica.
Mike D
- ----- Excerpt From Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Gandy" <Stephen@CameraQuest.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar NOT Back on Top
> . . .Pics are at http://cameraquest.com/LM6JM.htm
>
>
In reply to:
Message from Stephen Gandy <Stephen@CameraQuest.com> (Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar Back on Top)
Message from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar Back on Top)
Message from "Dante A. Stella" <dante@umich.edu> (Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar Back on Top)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar Back on Top)
Message from Stephen Gandy <Stephen@CameraQuest.com> (Re: [Leica] Leitz Wetzlar NOT Back on Top)