Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Simon, I appreciate your comments, and my apoligies if I offended you or anyone else. I wasn't intending to be insenitive, as I, too, thought that the locals used the term to catagorize a minority in a way that would be considered inappropriate in the US. But that is the term the locals use, and I used it (parenthetically) so that one would know what the locals were talking about. There are also African immigrants/refugees selling fake Rolexes, fake designer purses, cheap souvenirs, etc., at every major tourist attraction, such as the Coliseum, leaning tower of Pisa, St. Mark's square, Eifel Tower, etc., who the locals call "the Africans," in a derrogatory way that I would consider inappropriate. I understand they are refugees who are sometines badly exploited by such entrepreneurs. I found them to be a good source of souvenir postcards for the children, selling large packets for only a dollar or two. Tom > This is going to sound preachy, I'm afraid. The Romany (otherwise known > incorrectly as Gypsies) are historically one of the most persecuted > minorities in the world, even to the present day. While it is > undoubtedly true that some street thieves in many parts of Europe are > Romany, I think that to equate them as such is an unwarranted ethnic > slur. Why not just call street thieves, street thieves? > > Sorry if this sounds oversensitive. > > Simon Stevens