Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:16 AM 1/25/01 -0800, you wrote: >This week's offering flirts perilously with the banal >(http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=148535&size=lg). Despite the >risk of my fragile ego dissolving into monkey dust, I'm open to critique. >Lee Bacchus >Vancouver Lee though this photo doesn't really "say anything" important (to me) it is a pretty neat collection of different shapes, shades, textures and tones which even manages to follow the rule of thirds somewhat. (It having an interesting element at at least 3 junctures of the four imaginary lines.) Your exposure must have been dead on and the Delta 100 (I haven't used it yet) must have a pretty good range because there is good detail across the whole wide spectrum in the image. Prefering places and things to people, I like it's lack of any human element. (other than the "MEN" sign.) Inanimate objects are more fun to shoot than people sometimes...but it's harder to judge their expression. :) Carpe Luminem, Michael E. Berube