Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LUX vs CRON
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 23:22:20 +0100
References: <001501c07e2a$57646f60$6401a8c0@Workgroup>

The 35 Summilux is considerably heavier than the 35 Summicron, and also much
larger. For me it is worth it, but for someone who shoots at 5.6 or 8 most of
the time, the Summicron is the better choice.

Nathan

Frank Filippone wrote:

> According to Leica Lit, the 35 Lux is 5 grams LIGHTER than the 35 Cron.....
>
> I have not handled the 2 side by side.... which is more bukky, and by how
> much?
>
> Weight favors the Lux....but then agin the pocket is $500 lighter too.....
>
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@earthlink.net

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch

General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/
Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/
Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/

In reply to: Message from "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] LUX vs CRON)