Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35/1.4 v. /2 question
From: "julianthomas.terra.es" <julianthomas@terra.es>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:36:44 +0100
References: <001801c07d9a$8234ae20$6401a8c0@Workgroup>

I bought a used summilux asph cos it was the same price as new 'cron. Unless
you use 1.4, by the 'cron. BTW I disagree that wide open the 'lux is run of
the mill!! Compared to what?

Julian
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 8:53 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] 35/1.4 v. /2 question


> The 35 ASPH 1.4 is worth an extra $500 used.... but unless you need the
> speed for low light and wide oipen lenses, spend $500 on film... get the
35
> ASPH 2.0
>
> For a SLR user with eyes in the 40-year category, I would go the other
> way.... the 1.4 will give extra light for focusing...but in a RF, this is
a
> null point....
>
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@earthlink.net
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] 35/1.4 v. /2 question)