Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Marcos, I haven't used the new and latest version of the Trilmar (my suggested name for this lens) but I do use a late version of the lens prior to the mechanical redesign. The focal length settings click easily into position and results are as good as one could wish for. The only slight criticism is in the extreme corners of the 28mm setting wide open. The latest version offers a great upgrade by the simple addition of the focusing tab, you know instantly what to hold to focus. It takes a little time to get used to the first version where the focal length selector ring is exactly where you'd expect the focusing ring to be. You'll enjoy seeing less of the lens in the frame when viewing as the front is narrower and you might even wish to explore depth of field possibilities but I've never found myself looking for that facility on the older version. The delight in not having to change lenses is grin inducing! regards, Jem - -----Original Message----- From: Marcos Jacobsen [SMTP:Jacobsen@algorithmics.com] Sent: 04 January 2001 21:38 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] Tri Elmar asph 28 35 50/4 and new motor Please somebody that have used the New Tri Elmar 28 35 50 / 4 , could give me impression and the response , because I 'm planning to buy it . I will be using in a travel and with M6 TTl .72 with Fuji Provia . Comments on a New M motor too . Marcos Jacobsen jacobsen@algorithmics.com.br