Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] American Photo
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 15:22:12 -0600
References: <B67A3A24.3C3A%howard.390@osu.edu>

I did not renew my subscription. The magazine got to arty and intellectual for
my tastes. I still subscribe to view camera but it seems to be getting away
from B & W and leaning toward the abstract and digital. Seems to be directed
at the commercial photographer rather than the amateur fine  art photographer.
The above is just my opinion only.

Martin Howard wrote:

> Mark Rabiner jotted down the following:
>
> > This year they seem to be looking more and more like the French PHOTO.
>
> Another magazine that people buy "just for the articles" ;)
>
> M.
>
> --
> Martin Howard                     | "Why don't they make gravestones
> Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU       |  cheerier?"
> email: howard.390@osu.edu         |                  -- Nigel Tufnel
> www: http://mvhoward.i.am/        +---------------------------------------

In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu> (Re: [Leica] American Photo)