Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Bokeh controversy
From: "Rob Heyman" <rheyman@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 15:12:19 +1000
References: <NBBBIDNIGLFOKNLJCPLHGEHKFAAA.danh@selectsa.com>

Sorry Dan, I just love ambiguity.
"(in terms of bokeh--we already know it's razor sharp)."
Rob



- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Honemann" <danh@selectsa.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 11:12 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Bokeh controversy


> No: bokeh as _opposed to_ resolution.  The elmarit is a sharp lens, but
how
> does it do with the OOF areas?  That was the question.
>
> Quick disclaimer for the bokeh-disparaging set: it really doens't matter.
> Just use your lenses--as long as they're Leica, of course--and be happy.
>
> > Razor sharp bokeh???
> >
> > > I'm interested in seeing how the current elmarit
> > > performs (in terms of bokeh--we already know it's razor sharp).
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Dan Honemann" <danh@selectsa.com> (RE: [Leica] Re: Bokeh controversy)