Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Voigtlander EC Meter vs Sekonic L208 Twinmate
From: John Collier <jbcollier@home.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:08:14 -0700

Well aside from the fact you cannot look through the VC meter or see the
LEDs when the camera is at eye level. If the meter had a button to hold
readings it would be perfect. Until then the MR meters work better as you
can look through the viewfinder and lock the reading.

John Collier

> From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net>
> 
> When you line up the LEDs, can't you then get your reading off of the two
> dials on the top? In other words, you look through the meter, use either
> aperture or shutter priority, move one or the other, depending on which
> priority, then pull the camera down and get your reading from the dials.
> Isn't this the way you use it?
> 
> Simon Stevens wrote:
> 
>> I wanted to get the Voigtlaender for my M4-P becase of the size. But the
>> reason I didn't is because you cannot meter at eye level. The leds are
>> on top and you can't lock a reading so you have to meter at waist level
>> and guess where you are pointing it. In my opinion this is a really
>> stupid design oversight as it completely ruins the advantage of a nice
>> tight 90mm-equivilent metering area. I haven't handled the Sekonic yet
>> (nobody here in DC has it in stock) but it looks to be nice and small
>> and it can meter in incident mode. It's also cheaper. :)
>> 

Replies: Reply from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] Voigtlander EC Meter vs Sekonic L208 Twinmate)