Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] What is fine art photography?
From: Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:09:14 -0500

Nick Poole jotted down the following:

> (Actually, I hate theorising about art for I believe it appeals to far more
> than the head, but I know you never suggested any such thing!)

I don't.  Unless you can eat it and gain nourishment from it, then I think
it's fair to say that the head is ultimately the only body part which would
gain anything from art.  I doubt that it has any greater effect on the blood
circulation, so we can rule out the heart as a benefactor... ;)

M.

- -- 
Martin Howard                 | Trying to determine human performance by
Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU   | experiments is nothing but the ritual of
email: howard.390@osu.edu     | The Ballet for the Gods of Invariance.
www: http://mvhoward.i.am/    +-------------------------------------------

Replies: Reply from Nick Poole <nick.botton@camphill.org.uk> (Re: [Leica] What is fine art photography?)