Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 12/5/00 6:02:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, mbell@mail.utexas.edu writes: << In one of my music history classes we were getting to the point in time that included Tchaikovsky. The professor said "I guess you are expecting me to say something about Tchaikovsky about now. He was my mother's favorite composer." Then he went on to his next topic. >> Mine, too. Also my father. The result was that they were willing to encourage me to explore the more avant garde stuff, like Beethoven, as part of my musical education. Appreciation of beautiful music can sometimes lead to good things.:) Seriously, because composers who came along late in any given "period", as defined by scholars, were not usually highly innovative, they are not ordinarily taught in depth in academic courses on music history. IME, unless they significantly added or changed something in the language of music, the late Romantics, including such concert favorites as Mahler and Bruckner, are given little more than footnotes in the history of Western music. A notable exception is Brahms, and for good reason. While many casual listeners tend to find his music impenetrable, he offers genuine challenges to scholars, conductors and performers of music, as well as serious audiences. In a very different way, he may be legitimately viewed as every bit as innovative as Wagner. This from my wife, who teaches this stuff at the college level. She doesn't much mind listening to Tscaikowsky now and again, either.:) Joe Sobel