Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>> I think that a "man jumping over a puddle" is just that. A man jumping over >> a puddle. You could take a photograph of a man picking his nose on the >> subway, And that is all it would be. Or a bend in the road just outside >> Cleveland is just a bend in the road outside Cleveland. Hopefully on the >> way out of Cleveland. ;) >> Jim > >Taking that comment into consideration, I have to ask, what's the whole >point of taking pictures. A picture of 'El Capitan' is just a big rock, an >Eagle in flight is just a bird, The Hindenberg on fire is just one picture >of thousands of fires everyday, etc, etc. > >Steve and by extension, the mona lisa is just a woman sitting in front of a window, the nightwatch, just a group of soldiers making the rounds, van gogh's room, just a room... the fact that we consider these "masterpieces" demonstrates that there's more at work in a work of art than the subject matter. it's hard to believe the issue would even come up for discussion, so obvious does it appear. to bring the discussion back to photography, if all the image was about was the explicit subject matter, then the 11 year old kid's snapshot of "el capitan" would be of the same value as aa's, and i'm sure that most of us would disagree with that (except kyle, maybe). guy