Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/11/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: don't be a smart-ass
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:03:07 -0500
References: <200011200020.QAA10651@spoon.alink.net> <002e01c053be$880b2fa0$aae7fcce@osprey> <3.0.6.32.20001121142330.00965100@pop.microtec.net> <002501c05402$b5722b80$140a640a@cusackknowles.com>
Chuck Albertson wrote:
> Basically (very basically), it says that states are immune from suits filed
> in the federal courts. Exceptions are where the Congress has specifically
> authorized particular claims (thoough these exceptions are being rolled back
> by the current Supreme Court),
....as a number of Amendments to the Constitution would be if certain Justices
thought they could get away with it. ;-)
B. D.
In reply to:
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: don't be a smart-ass)
Message from "Paul Arnold" <osprey@bmt.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: don't be a smart-ass)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: don't be a smart-ass)
Message from chucko@siteconnect.com (Chuck Albertson) (Re: [Leica] Re: don't be a smart-ass)